Comments on: O&M Diaries: Boone Oakley http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/ Enlightenment under the Buddhi Free Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:59:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Ankur Banerjee http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/comment-page-1/#comment-112 Ankur Banerjee Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:29:02 +0000 http://buddhifree.com/?p=496#comment-112 I mean, dude, power to you for getting the amazing concept but for heaven's sake make it readable. :) But seriously, the video website thing is a neat idea. I mean, dude, power to you for getting the amazing concept but for heaven’s sake make it readable. :) But seriously, the video website thing is a neat idea.

]]> By: Ankur Banerjee http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/comment-page-1/#comment-1053 Ankur Banerjee Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:29:00 +0000 http://buddhifree.com/?p=496#comment-1053 I mean, dude, power to you for getting the amazing concept but for heaven's sake make it readable. :) But seriously, the video website thing is a neat idea. I mean, dude, power to you for getting the amazing concept but for heaven’s sake make it readable. :) But seriously, the video website thing is a neat idea.

]]> By: Bill Allen http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/comment-page-1/#comment-111 Bill Allen Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:18:58 +0000 http://buddhifree.com/?p=496#comment-111 Whoops! Yeah, that was just a fun iPhone pic in bad light ... we'll get a better image for the white paper and seminar. :) Whoops! Yeah, that was just a fun iPhone pic in bad light … we’ll get a better image for the white paper and seminar. :)

]]> By: Bill Allen http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/comment-page-1/#comment-1052 Bill Allen Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:18:00 +0000 http://buddhifree.com/?p=496#comment-1052 Whoops! Yeah, that was just a fun iPhone pic in bad light ... we'll get a better image for the white paper and seminar. :) Whoops! Yeah, that was just a fun iPhone pic in bad light … we’ll get a better image for the white paper and seminar. :)

]]> By: rach http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/comment-page-1/#comment-110 rach Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:00:54 +0000 http://buddhifree.com/?p=496#comment-110 hahaha...again, I was commenting about the concept, not the quality of the pic... hahaha…again, I was commenting about the concept, not the quality of the pic…

]]> By: rach http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/comment-page-1/#comment-1051 rach Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:00:00 +0000 http://buddhifree.com/?p=496#comment-1051 hahaha...again, I was commenting about the concept, not the quality of the pic... hahaha…again, I was commenting about the concept, not the quality of the pic…

]]> By: Ankur Banerjee http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/comment-page-1/#comment-109 Ankur Banerjee Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:50:35 +0000 http://buddhifree.com/?p=496#comment-109 The sitemap is hardly readable. Is it too much to expect an in-focus shot, taken with a tripod and at a resolution at which things are readable? The sitemap is hardly readable. Is it too much to expect an in-focus shot, taken with a tripod and at a resolution at which things are readable?

]]> By: Ankur Banerjee http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/comment-page-1/#comment-1050 Ankur Banerjee Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:50:00 +0000 http://buddhifree.com/?p=496#comment-1050 The sitemap is hardly readable. Is it too much to expect an in-focus shot, taken with a tripod and at a resolution at which things are readable? The sitemap is hardly readable. Is it too much to expect an in-focus shot, taken with a tripod and at a resolution at which things are readable?

]]> By: Bill Allen http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/comment-page-1/#comment-108 Bill Allen Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:07:05 +0000 http://buddhifree.com/?p=496#comment-108 Hey, thanks for the post. Glad everyone is enjoying it so much. Actually I think the site is pretty solid on SEO, certainly no worse than your average flash driven agency portfolio I would think. No, the video isn't SEO friendly, no video is but yet they are still easy to find and that's because YouTube has a pretty intricate tagging set up. That, coupled with inbound linking, the content of the actual page itself ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elo7WeIydh8 ) and the domain it lives in (Google owns Youtube) help out as well. Finally ... the idea really isn't to be central but to be everywhere. And I'm not sure how all the blog entries and embeds and their specific content factor in to search algorithms. Now granted, if it sucked we'd be in real trouble. ;) Thanks for the post and the thoughts. Hey, thanks for the post. Glad everyone is enjoying it so much.

Actually I think the site is pretty solid on SEO, certainly no worse than your average flash driven agency portfolio I would think.

No, the video isn’t SEO friendly, no video is but yet they are still easy to find and that’s because YouTube has a pretty intricate tagging set up. That, coupled with inbound linking, the content of the actual page itself ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elo7WeIydh8 ) and the domain it lives in (Google owns Youtube) help out as well.

Finally … the idea really isn’t to be central but to be everywhere. And I’m not sure how all the blog entries and embeds and their specific content factor in to search algorithms.

Now granted, if it sucked we’d be in real trouble. ;) Thanks for the post and the thoughts.

]]> By: Bill Allen http://buddhifree.com/2009/06/om-diaries-boone-oakley/comment-page-1/#comment-1049 Bill Allen Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:07:00 +0000 http://buddhifree.com/?p=496#comment-1049 Hey, thanks for the post. Glad everyone is enjoying it so much. Actually I think the site is pretty solid on SEO, certainly no worse than your average flash driven agency portfolio I would think. No, the video isn't SEO friendly, no video is but yet they are still easy to find and that's because YouTube has a pretty intricate tagging set up. That, coupled with inbound linking, the content of the actual page itself ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elo7WeIydh8 ) and the domain it lives in (Google owns Youtube) help out as well. Finally ... the idea really isn't to be central but to be everywhere. And I'm not sure how all the blog entries and embeds and their specific content factor in to search algorithms. Now granted, if it sucked we'd be in real trouble. ;) Thanks for the post and the thoughts. Hey, thanks for the post. Glad everyone is enjoying it so much.

Actually I think the site is pretty solid on SEO, certainly no worse than your average flash driven agency portfolio I would think.

No, the video isn’t SEO friendly, no video is but yet they are still easy to find and that’s because YouTube has a pretty intricate tagging set up. That, coupled with inbound linking, the content of the actual page itself ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Elo7WeIydh8 ) and the domain it lives in (Google owns Youtube) help out as well.

Finally … the idea really isn’t to be central but to be everywhere. And I’m not sure how all the blog entries and embeds and their specific content factor in to search algorithms.

Now granted, if it sucked we’d be in real trouble. ;) Thanks for the post and the thoughts.

]]>